David Bowie – Artist, disruptor, creative technologist

It’s almost David Bowie’s birthday, it’s also almost the anniversary of his death. It’s also almost six years ago that Bowie released the wonderful Blackstar, a record that saw him reinvent his sound and artistic persona once again. This time he teamed up with jazz artists like Jason Lindner and Mark Giuliana. He also took inspiration from the likes of Kendrick Lamar and Death Grips. This record would not have sounded as it did without these contributors and inspirations. It’s also typical of how Bowie remade himself and his music time and again: by finding new collaborators. It might be the most personal lesson one can take from Bowie, that the people you commune with define not just what you make but also who you are. Bowie found communion through his artistry, his disruptions of masculinity and stardom, and his desire to try on new technologies. I’ll take you through these three communions and show you what we can learn from Bowie as move through ever faster phases of change.

Disruptor Bowie

Let’s start with how Bowie dealt with his mental wellbeing. Each iteration of the artist David Bowie allowed him to create a narrative that not only helped him sell his music, it also helped him shield his non-artist persona. And Bowie was fiercely protective of this person. In today’s creator economy it seems impossible to be so protective of your personal self. The continuous strain on creating output that others can engage with is immense. The singer-songwriter Chelsea Cutler just made this point as she tried to explain that she’s not a “content creator” but a “musician and performer.” Moreover, she says she doesn’t “know how to keep up with how insatiable our content culture has become.” In feeding the machine, creators don’t build fanbases, but simply vie for attention. I’ve written about a need to flip the funnel and build fanbases from the ground up. Tatiana Cirisano calls for tools that will help creators build fanbases that can become self-perpetuating:

“Creators need specialised tools to help them build fans – not followings – who will stick around in between content releases, as well as ways for fans to engage with the content (and each other) absent the creator.”

And Bowie himself has some fantastic advice on this. In a documentary called Inspirations from 1997 he spoke of the need to:

“never play to the gallery … Always remember that the reason you initially started working was that there was something inside yourself that felt that if you could manifest it in some way you would understand more about yourself and how you co-exist in society.”

Throughout Bowie’s artistic reincarnations, he also used his carnal body to disrupt how everyone else not only looked at him, but also how they regulated themselves and society more broadly. Beyond the obvious and direct references to androgyny, Bowie also put forward something else in the way he built his characters. Especially the early ones like Ziggy Stardust, where he definitely challenged standard ideas of sexuality, also included important markers for how music defines space. Again, this can be taken literally: “Major Tom to ground control” or, more completely, the version of Commander Chris Hadfield aboard the International Space Station.

But music also marks territories and provides clues that help give people an understanding of the spaces they occupy. As such, music can empower people to engage with and create spaces. These efforts are never done alone, but always together, with others.

Artist Bowie

When people want to showcase how great the variety of musical collaborators Bowie worked with was they often create a spectrum from Bing Crosby to Freddy Mercury. It is, however, more interesting to see what happened to the artist David Bowie each time he worked with a different artist or set of artists. It’s also important to note that Bowie was more than a singer. He was a producer, a songwriter, a multi-instrumentalist, a painter, an actor, and he arranged music as well as write it. Time and again, Bowie sought fresh incentives to help spur him on to try new things.

So when Bowie worked with Lou Reed or Iggy Pop he not only helped them create astonishingly good music. He also almost absorbed them into his own styles. He seems to have fed off them as much as they did off him. A similar cross-pollination can be found in Berlin when Bowie worked with Brian Eno. Likewise, when Bowie became a stage actor in The Elephant Man, he took all of the tricks he learned from performing characters through his music and implemented them in the theater setting.  

Subsequently, he took what he learned from stage acting into the angular 1980s hits like Let’s Dance.

When we hit upon Blackstar, the importance of the other musicians involved cannot be overstated. However, that’s not to say that those musicians did not feel an outsize influence from working with Bowie. I already mentioned Lindner and Guiliana, but together with Donny McCaslin and Tim Lefebvre, they actually already formed a jazz quartet. The strength of bringing in a group of musicians who knew each other inside out helped in the recording sessions and gave Bowie a strong foundation to build on. The chemistry helped form a record that’s as much rock as it is jazz. The songs received a structure befitting Bowie’s pop/rock sensibilities, but showcase a curiosity for particularities that’s inherent in jazz. Bowie learned by creating these types of synergy between himself and his collaborators.

Creative technologist Bowie

One of the big questions swirling around the NFT hype train is whether these token should be classified as securities. Whenever these NFTs involve some kind of ongoing entitlement to royalties or ownership of copyright securities bells start ringing. And yet Bowie was way ahead of the game here. In 1997 he released ‘Bowie Bonds’, which were an asset-backed security. It was also one of the first examples of using intellectual property as such an underlying asset to a bond. Not only were the bonds popular – Bowie sold $55m worth of them – but it also led Bowie’s partner in this venture, David Pullman, to do similar asset-backed securities with James Brown and The Isley Brothers.

Crucially to the current discussions around the vagueness of NFT royalties and contracts, the Bowie Bonds were very specifically defined. They had a limited time of activity – 10 years – and they only related to royalties from wholesale physical releases in the US. There’s value in such specificity, but no guarantees. The bonds Pullman worked out with The Isley Brothers ended in disputes with EMI Records, Michael Bolton because they had wanted to buy the catalogue outright. Another important point was that the intellectual property itself stayed with the creator. Only if the bond would default, would the investor end up with the copyright. Bowie himself thought copyright would be gone by now, which is why he wanted to keep control of how he made money from his IP while he still could.

Besides the financial innovation of securitizing his intellectual property, Bowie also was an early innovator in other spaces. In 1998, for example, he set up Bowienet, an internet service provider that gave users access to unreleased tracks, but also a bit of space (5mb) to create their own websites.

“I wanted to create an environment where not just my fans, but all music fans could be part of a single community where vast archives of music and information could be accessed, views stated and ideas exchanged.”

David Bowie

Every musician or band with a subscription service, such as a Patreon, is basically indebted to Bowienet. The message Bowie posted on the frontpage of Bowienet at launch already showcased the previously mentioned need to create spaces where fans can interact with content and with each other:

“The purpose of BowieNet is interactivity and community – plain and clear – everybody has a voice. We have terrific partners so the services and hopefully your experiences at BowieNet will reflect everyone’s commitment to excellence. So – let’s go – mouse rules, okay!”

Bowie legacy

Overall, David Bowie’s legacy is alive and kicking. More than musically, this legacy also allows artists today to look at how Bowie shaped himself and his environment. He was out there, but never gave himself away. He was open to new technologies and innovation, but only if they worked to his own advantage. Most importantly, however, he only ever move forward by being open to others, by understanding that he co-exists in society, and by finding ways to let inspiration be a two-way street.

A simple guide to disrupting the music industry

The trigger: a new technology or a shift in the digital landscape. Aspiring founders are searching for a good use case to leverage that development and turn to something they’re passionate about. Music. With a vague understanding of the music business, they proudly announce their plan that will totally disrupt the industry.

People who’ve spent a decade in music have likely seen a dozen of companies promising to disrupt come and go. Disruption doesn’t sell. Solving problems does. The most common misunderstanding seems to stem from a fallacy around intermediaries and that disintermediation always improves things. The oversimplified view is that everything besides the artist & fan is ‘extra’ and both would profit if it can be successfully disrupted.

The reality is that things don’t function as an artist-management-label-distributor-DSP-fan chain. Music doesn’t always travel through it like that. Value doesn’t always travel through that chain. Instead there’s a whole network of connections where various types of value are exchanged, connected and created. In most cases it’s not linear; it’s a network.

The above may seem obvious, but this misunderstanding occurs time and time again. It leads founders to present themselves in an adversarial way to parts of the industry that actually should be their customer. If you can do X better than how a label is currently doing that, then that label might be happy to pay you for it. Artists & their management have a ton of things to do, so in many cases they’re happy to let labels or label services companies take care of some of it.

Don’t get me wrong: there are plenty of inefficiencies and practices of exploitation in the music industry that need to be disrupted. These may occur anywhere in the ecosystem (which also includes other parties like everything related to live, merch, PROs, etc) or in the connections between players. They typically don’t apply to an entire domain, e.g. ‘all labels’ or ‘all booking agencies’. Even when they do, like in the case of inefficiencies or friction, there may be other aspects of those businesses that would not benefit from complete disruption.

What I’m saying is do your research. Create a map of the industry’s domain you’re interested in and also map out everything adjacent to it, because there will be unforeseen connections. Understand how companies collaborate, what goals they’re trying to achieve, how they add value, and where frictions may occur. Read Don Passman‘s All You Need to Know About the Music Business. Speak with people to understand whether your research is based on current-day practices, because it definitely happens that people launch companies with assumptions based on early 2000s practices.

Music is complex. Part of it unnecessarily, but there’s a reason why things are structured this way. Figure out those reasons. Learn how others leverage those reasons to pioneer new businesses. Identify the trends. Understand the complexity to avoid endless pivots and repositioning. Music is in need of innovation – do it through partnership.

tents at what might or might not be a music festival

The Urgent Need for a Sustainable Music Industry – and the Innovations that Make it Possible

Every month this year has been the hottest in recorded history. Our weather is getting increasingly unpredictable, leading to more storms and floods in some areas and extreme droughts and forest fires in others.

The importance of selling music, or solving problems in the music business, pales in comparison with these issues.

However, these are not separate. We are the environment and our actions affect it. You can bet that last century’s vast record distribution networks made an important contribution to our CO2 output.

Can you guess how much of the CO2 footprint of a CD purchase comes from the ride between the consumer’s home and retail outlet?

10%?

Bit more.

Try something like 20-30%.

Well..

Still wrong.

It’s 50%.

CO2 cost of music sales
Comparison of six album purchase scenarios in GHG emissions (g CO2/album). Error bars represent 90% credible intervals from Monte Carlo analysis. (Source: Microsoft, Intel)

The good news is that consuming music digitally reduces the CO2 footprint of that music by 40-80%. So, sure, the decline of the CD brought a decrease in revenues for the overall music industry, but at least we get a less tangible benefit in return. And the industry appears to be recovering.

In economics, there is a concept called negative externalities which is defined as “economic activity that imposes a negative effect on an unrelated third party.” Take the CD trade as an example. It imposed a large negative effect on consumers, since the taxes levied around transportation do not raise enough money to reverse the effects of the associated CO2 output.

There are many remaining negative externalities in the music business, but technological innovation can help alleviate problems. It’s in our economic interest to care about these negative externalities. If we can prevent scenarios with cataclysmic weather events, consumers might be a little more relaxed to go see a gig, buy some merch, and spend money on music instead of sand bags to protect their house against a flood. I’m not exaggerating: floods in US coastal cities have more than doubled since the 1980s.

Transportation

As highlighted before, transportation is one of the biggest contributors to CO2 output. What can we do besides driving hybrids or environment-‘friendly’ trucks?

The commute to the studio

Democratized means of production, such as production software and more affordable high quality digital equipment, have reduced the need for regular commutes to the studio. Studios may still be a necessity due to acoustics, sound isolation and for recording purposes, but you don’t need them every step of the way.

Bedroom producers are polar bears’ best friends.

Hawaiian polar bear

The commute to the office

What goes for musicians, definitely goes for most people with office jobs in the music business. If you want to be a sustainable company in this day and age, encourage everyone who’s able to, to work from (close to) home at least 1-2 days a week.

VR and concerts

Perhaps the biggest contributors to the industry’s carbon emissions are live touring and festivals. They require equipment to be shipped, band members to be flown, and fans to be congregated. In the UK, audience travel is estimated to account for 43% of the industry’s gas emissions. The rise of electronic dance music and hiphop have helped to reduce the amount of equipment, and band members, being flown around. Virtual reality could be a next step.

While VR won’t replace the concert experience, it will offer a new competing experience. Being able to host virtual performances for fans worldwide, at a much lower cost, won’t just help reduce emissions, but can also alleviate some of the stress that a lifestyle of always being on tour entails. There has been much attention for mental health in music recently: perhaps VR can help?

VR, band practice and collaboration

Another reason why people come together a lot is for practice and collaboration. What if you could work together in a virtual environment, from the comfort of your homes? What if that virtual environment replicated a normal practice studio perfectly? What if that virtual environment could provide an experience richer, especially in terms of features, than a real world place?

Merch, 3D Printing, and distributed manufacturing

Another big cost to the industry, consumer, and environment: shipping merchandise. And let’s think beyond just the t-shirts. Some artists ship in large quantities, but most don’t have the scale to mass-produce. They produce small batches, and then ship them around the world from where they live. It would arrive at your home or a local pick-up point. What if instead, you order something, it’s produced at the nearest 3D printer and you can pick it up from there. Not only are there less emissions involved, but it might be faster too. There are still questions about whether the amount of energy required offsets the carbon emissions, particularly for mass production, but some printers are performing great.

Services like 3D Hubs are already providing over 1 billion people with access to 3D printers within 10 miles from their home.

Developments in commercial flight

Even if we don’t do anything, technology is being developed to make flight a lot cleaner. Biofuels may reduce carbon emissions by 36-85%. Longer term, lithium-ion batteries may allow for solar-powered flight. We’re not quite there yet, but as can be seen in the video below, Elon Musk is optimistic that it’s doable.

Hardware

Now let’s tackle the impact of producing some of the equipment necessary for making music. Some instruments get resold, recycled, or re-used. A lot of hardware doesn’t, though. According to a UN study, only 15.5% of ‘e-waste’ gets recycled.

Furthermore, there is a lot of unused value sitting inside communities.

Self-driving vehicles promise to reduce the amount of cars we need to manufacture. Why? Because our cars are standing still 95% of the time. If cars are automated and shared, one car could service many more people on a day than it would normally do in a month.

Likewise, a lot of instruments and equipment go unused for vast amounts of time. What if there was a way to share this value with other musicians in your community? Think Airbnb for music equipment, which includes insurance. A startup called Demooz lets you borrow things to try before you buy. A startup with a broader use case, Peerby, lets you lend to and borrow from your neighbours. For free, or you can charge a fee.

So, maybe you don’t have to go to the studio to use a good microphone and there is also no necessity for everyone to own all of the equipment they might need either.

Why spend money when you can be like Kramer?

Festivals & events

A lot of festivals are powered by diesel generators, costing around half a billion euros each year, just in Europe. As much as three quarters of the UK music industry’s greenhouse gas emissions come from live performances.

Tents get left behind, a lot of water is used to clean, and cars queue up for hours to get into parking lots.

One of the most interesting music-related startup accelerators has to be Open-House. They look at how events can be made more efficient, but also how festivals can be used as a case study for how we organise humanitarian aid, or solving other societal issues.

Their startups include Kartent, a recyclable cardboard tent, Sanitrax, which makes the toilet experience more efficient, and Watt-Now, an energy monitoring system for festivals.

Each year, Amsterdam Dance Event organises a full day of presentations, panels and discussions about sustainability in events and dance music, called ADE Green. Other conferences should take note.

Conferences

Music industry events used to be the only way to handle business for a lot of people. Now, with fast communication, video calls, etc. that aspect has lost its importance. Even for networking, Slack channels like the Music Tech Network or good old Twitter might be a n easier way to get in touch with relevant people, and especially more CO2 efficient. Sure, online networking doesn’t build the same trust relation as meeting face to face does, but collaboration does – and with such vast arsenals of tools at our disposal for online collaboration, there has never been a better chance to involve people from around the world in your projects.

And if you’re going to organise a conference that flies in a lot of people – at least dedicate some time to sustainability.

Using music to inspire

Music is powerful. When people come to a festival, for many, it will be an experience they’ll never forget.

Music is part of everyone’s life. From Fortune 500 CEO to high school student, from plumber to engineer.

This gives us a unique position. We get to dictate the standard. We get to influence what is ‘cool’, and what should be considered normal.

Consider a large-scale, ‘green’ festival, such as the UK’s Shambala. Implementing these solutions has a ripple effect.

Music has the power to inspire movements and new societal norms. It can ignite revolutions.

Let’s use music’s power to inspire people to build a greener world.

Extra resources

If you want to make the music business more sustainable, here are some amazing sets of resources to help you on your way.

  • Julie’s Bicycle: a global charity dedicated to making the creative industries sustainable. They have a vast set of resources ranging from guides, to fact sheets, and webinars.
  • Ouishare: a collaborative economy initiative that does research, connects people together, and shares advice and insight into how sharing can make us more resource efficient.